Sackchief

I'm twenty years old.

Hey Sackchief, just wanted to make sure you got this message. It's been 2 months since I sent in the request for Brainwasher's rollback rights and yet no response.

On another note, I would like to put forth a request for bureaucracy. I've been the longest-running active admin here and constantly update the wiki (giving the wiki its entire current design). Considering you take long periods of inactivity, I think we need an active bureaucrat who logs in at most every other day; and we can avoid situations like this where a user awaiting rights does not have to wait for months until the inactive bureaucrat gets on. I think it is the best decision to promote a new bureaucrat here, and I am among the only active admins here with Zippo, and the best course for this wiki. Thanks.

Bureaucracy just complicates things and makes once great nations fall to their knees for the liberal extremists. Couldn't you call them editors, because that's more of what the job of working on this wiki involves.

Uh, what?

I was just saying that Editor would be a more appropriate title for these people. And that liberalism is tearing the heart out of western countries and further oppressing indigenous peoples identity and sense of morals with political correctness.

"Editor" is a more proper title over "Bureaucrat"? No, especially since politics has nothing to do with this. It's the name of a user group on a website, it has no effect.

This has turned into a matter of personal opinion. And yes, politics have nothing to do with TLOU. Neither does its archives. "Bureaucrat" would suggest that the people in question, is an official in a government department. So by what measure does that make them bureaucrats?

You're taking this out of context and creating uneccessary discussion over a topic you clearly don't understand. I'd suggest dropping it so this thread can retain its original point.

"Clearly don't understand". Look in the mirror.

Back on the topic...FortunateSurvivor8, all people (including people who haven't created an account) can edit any page of this wiki. Calling a crat an "Editor" is about as helpful as me calling you a "Person". We are all already editors.

"Bureaucrat" is simply a position most wikis use, including the original Wikia. If you don't like it, take it up with them.

A couple more things of note...you seem to have a very enthusiastic streak for taking threads wildly off topic. Here, for example, you talk about how this topic has turned into a "matter of personal opinion" because you specifically steered it there. Word of advice: don't. It clearly makes you upset, it wastes time, and it annoys the other editors. In particular, your virulent hatred for liberals is pretty much textbook hate speech, which is against wiki policy. Please try to be tolerant of other people's beliefs.

A while ago, you mentioned interest in a position of greater responsibility. Repeatedly antagonizing other editors of this wiki is a great way to ensure that you'll never get that position.

I agree with your decision.  I'll give him the rights when I get a chance.

That'd be a good idea actually.  We're a bit understaffed at the moment and you contribute quite a bit.  As long as you promise to use said powers responsibly, I'll give them to you.

Thanks! I was approached with the idea by NinjaFatGuy, but he hasn't responded to my message yet.

Alright, I'll figure something out within the next week.  I'll let you know when I come to a final decision.

Thanks!

Sackchief, while you are in consideration of rights, I'd also look into Brainwasher5 for a rollback position -- he'd been editing very frequently for at least a year and he seems very knowledgeable and responsible, and helps monitor the wiki for issues. If you'd think it's a good idea, I'll drop him a message.

Alright Braden, I gave you admin rights.  Use them responsibly.  And NFG, Brainwasher seems fit for a rollback position.  You can let him know that its available.

Welcome aboard, Braden, you've earned it. And I will drop him a message, Sackchief.

Awesome! Thank you so much!

Not edit warring. No sources at all for age, it should be left blank.

So don't add it, simple.

Then why do you keep adding an age to her page when your logic is that there is no source? And even then, you're still edit warring. Edit warring, by definition is continuous reverts of an edit on both parties, which is what you're doing, so even then, your false claims of not causing an edit war are asinine.

I've changed her age to 'Late 30's to early 40's", it's an aproximation and we're not stating it as fact.

You are edit warring, stop lying.

First of all, Riley Heligo is a highly respected member of this community. He's not lying; you were the one that insisted on changing her age from an approximation to a more exact year.

I think the anon was talking to the anon who instigated the edit war.

The anon 24.77.45.133 is still edit warring on the Tess article, that's why i'm asking a block, edit warring is against every wiki's policy, either refrain for it, or get blocked by an admin.

Oops, sorry. Hadn't had my coffee yet.

Then you may want to let NinjaFatGuy or FireBurn12 know, just so this gets handled quickly.

Alright, I'll contact them.

If there's no available source, then it should be left blank.  Thats common sense.  Leave it as unknown or include a reference.  For all you know, Tess could be in her twenties.

I should say, there are many anonymous vandals in this wiki, they all should be blocked, M67PattonZippo was reverting all the vandalism caused by them.

If there's a vandal, let me know and I'll drop the hammer of justice.

No offense, but I strongly doubt you'll get it. You've got four comments on threads and three edits to your userpage.

I will take your comment into thought, thank you 

But, you never know unless you ask

You're jumping the gun a bit.  You're still a bit new to the wiki having joined this week, and we're glad you did join, but you can't be an admin until you've proven yourself and shown some devotion to the community over a period of time.  Plus, I personally like to give moderator status before anything.  Stick around, get to know people and do some editing.  

Thank you, it will be a honour

Seconded with Riley. It's not just about seniority, it's about knowing whether you're a good and consistent editor in the first place. Demonstrate that first and I'm sure I'd trust a nomination for you to be an admin.

thank you for the subport, already i feel I have friends, lol, but soon...

Actually, check my sandbox.

Your template looks good.  You have my permission to use it.

Templates modified, i'll apply it to all multiplayer weapons soon

my two cents: most wikis don't specifically put the nav boxes under a navigation section; they just leave the boxes at the bottom.

Sorry man, I got used to do it on the GTA wiki, I found it more organized.

Well your way isn't necessarily wrong. We could vote on it, or something.

That's fine for me.

By the way, Swagboi's been either using profanity or trying to evade profanity on multiple walls. Please warn him.

I do have a PS4.  My PSN name is the same as  my name here.  Also if you are upsetting other users by using profanity, please tone it down.  Thanks.

If you were referring to Fireburn12's planned TLoU show, that was apparently scrapped a while back. If you were referring to the game itself, this wiki is not affiliated with Naugty Dog. Sorry.

You'll have to clarify a bit.  I'm not sure what you mean by audition.

Ohhhhhhh.  Okay, thanks!  That actually helps a lot! 

I just kind of meant for the movie.  I thought the Fireburn12's planned show was for the movie, but M67PattonZippo clarifed it for me.  But if you have any idea on how to try and audition for the movie, please let me know.  When I say audition, I mean to try and be part of the movie.  Thanks :)

Unfortnutely, Fireburn isn't around much any more. Try contacting Naughty Dog. They should be able to point you in the right direction

Ohhh, okay.  Thank you for letting me know!  This really helped.  Thanks once again